[VOIPSEC] Open SBC?

Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Wed May 9 09:44:02 CDT 2007



Diana Cionoiu wrote:
> Why in the earth will anyone complicate so bad just to get an SBC?

Because its free and well known. Maybe you can do all the things with 
Yate too - but I can comment only on software I know.

So, you recommend Yate as SBC?

regards
klaus

> 
> Diana
> 
> On Wed, 9 May 2007, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> 
>> Hi Martyn!
>>
>> It depends on features you require from a SBC. E.g. ser/openser is very
>> powerful for NAT traversal. There are also modules to block DoS
>> (pike/ratelimit).
>>
>> For other features like topology hiding and call tear down you need a
>> B2BUA, thus ser/openser can't be used - but Asterisk.
>>
>> Thus, if you want an openser source SBC you can combine (open)ser and
>> Asterisk nad you will have a very flexible SBC - but of course it will
>> be lot of work for configuration and wont run out-of-the-box like
>> commercial SBCs.
>>
>> regards
>> klaus
>>
>>
>> Martyn Davies wrote:
>>> I put a call out on my blog the other day
>>> (http://martyndavies.livejournal.com/27327.html) about whether any group
>>> had tried putting together an open source Session Border Controller.  I
>>> got some interesting responses, but I wanted to throw the question up to
>>> a wider audience.  Does anyone on the Voipsec list know of such a thing?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Or taking a slightly different tack, is anyone familiar enough with
>>> Freeswitch (http://www.freeswitch.org/) to comment on the feasibility of
>>> building an SBC with Freeswitch?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>
>>> Martyn
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> | Martyn Davies, Principal Consultant
>>>
>>> | Dialogic
>>>
>>> | Kings Chase, 107-123 King St, Maidenhead, SL6 1DP, UK
>>> | Tel:  +44 1628 641 790 x 210
>>>
>>> | Cell: +44 7881 908 381
>>>
>>> | Follow Me: +44 7031 911 586
>>>
>>> | martyn.davies at dialogic.com <mailto:martyn.davies at dialogic.com>
>>>
>>> | blog: http://www.dialogic.com/drc <http://www.dialogic.com/drc>
>>>
>>> | blog: http://voipsa.org/blog <http://voipsa.org/blog>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Company Registration Number 2017909
>>>
>>> Registered in England and Wales
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
>>> information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
>>> disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
>>> otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the internet. Any
>>> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited. If
>>> you have received this e-mail in error, or are not named as a recipient,
>>> please immediately notify the sender and destroy all copies of this
>>> e-mail.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Voipsec mailing list
>>> Voipsec at voipsa.org
>>> http://voipsa.org/mailman/listinfo/voipsec_voipsa.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Voipsec mailing list
>> Voipsec at voipsa.org
>> http://voipsa.org/mailman/listinfo/voipsec_voipsa.org
>>




More information about the Voipsec mailing list