[VOIPSEC] Open SBC?

[Diana Cionoiu]

Why in the earth will anyone complicate so bad just to get an SBC?

Diana

On Wed, 9 May 2007, Klaus Darilion wrote:

> Hi Martyn!
>
> It depends on features you require from a SBC. E.g. ser/openser is very
> powerful for NAT traversal. There are also modules to block DoS
> (pike/ratelimit).
>
> For other features like topology hiding and call tear down you need a
> B2BUA, thus ser/openser can't be used - but Asterisk.
>
> Thus, if you want an openser source SBC you can combine (open)ser and
> Asterisk nad you will have a very flexible SBC - but of course it will
> be lot of work for configuration and wont run out-of-the-box like
> commercial SBCs.
>
> regards
> klaus
>
>
> Martyn Davies wrote:
>> I put a call out on my blog the other day
>> (http://martyndavies.livejournal.com/27327.html) about whether any group
>> had tried putting together an open source Session Border Controller.  I
>> got some interesting responses, but I wanted to throw the question up to
>> a wider audience.  Does anyone on the Voipsec list know of such a thing?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Or taking a slightly different tack, is anyone familiar enough with
>> Freeswitch (http://www.freeswitch.org/) to comment on the feasibility of
>> building an SBC with Freeswitch?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>>
>> Martyn
>>
>>
>>
>> | Martyn Davies, Principal Consultant
>>
>> | Dialogic
>>
>> | Kings Chase, 107-123 King St, Maidenhead, SL6 1DP, UK
>> | Tel:  +44 1628 641 790 x 210
>>
>> | Cell: +44 7881 908 381
>>
>> | Follow Me: +44 7031 911 586
>>
>> | martyn.davies at dialogic.com <mailto:martyn.davies at dialogic.com>
>>
>> | blog: http://www.dialogic.com/drc <http://www.dialogic.com/drc>
>>
>> | blog: http://voipsa.org/blog <http://voipsa.org/blog>
>>
>>
>>
>> Company Registration Number 2017909
>>
>> Registered in England and Wales
>>
>>
>>
>> This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain
>> information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from
>> disclosure under applicable law. No waiver of privilege, confidence or
>> otherwise is intended by virtue of communication via the internet. Any
>> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying is strictly prohibited. If
>> you have received this e-mail in error, or are not named as a recipient,
>> please immediately notify the sender and destroy all copies of this
>> e-mail.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Voipsec mailing list
>> Voipsec at voipsa.org
>> http://voipsa.org/mailman/listinfo/voipsec_voipsa.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Voipsec mailing list
> Voipsec at voipsa.org
> http://voipsa.org/mailman/listinfo/voipsec_voipsa.org
>