[VOIPSEC] Juniper as an SBC

[J. Oquendo]

On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Jacek Materna wrote:

> I believe the question was more directed at not what you do or have  
> but rather why you need an sbc will address some specific security  
> concerns. There's alot of misinformation out these days pertaining to  
> sbcs and security.  Two words which I consider mutually exclusive.  
> Sbcs are traffic mgt systems pulled onto the world of security. There  
> has to be specific concerns you have in order to want a sbc.
> 

Doh, apologies for the prior rambling. No I'm not looking for an SBC
based on any security concerns but rather functionality constraints
present in my exiting Netrakes. I've went through this before (seeking
out comments on SBC's - Hi Hadrial & *@acmepacket). Was simply asking
what are one's likes and dislikes if using Juniper as an SBC.


=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
J. Oquendo
SGFA, SGFE, C|EH, CNDA, CHFI, OSCP

"Enough research will tend to support your
conclusions." - Arthur Bloch

"A conclusion is the place where you got
tired of thinking" - Arthur Bloch

227C 5D35 7DCB 0893 95AA  4771 1DCE 1FD1 5CCD 6B5E
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5CCD6B5E