[VOIPSEC] Juniper as an SBC

Scott Berkman scott.berkman at reignmaker.net
Sat Feb 21 13:21:42 CST 2009


I agree that you should go to Covergence over Juniper.  The Kagoor boxes
were very good at far-end NAT traversal but not much else.  

I also know some places that are using NextTone/NextPoint/Genband with
good results, but I haven't been hands on with them much.

	-Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan Stratton [mailto:nathan at robotics.net] 
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 5:49 PM
To: J. Oquendo
Cc: voipsec at voipsa.org
Subject: Re: [VOIPSEC] Juniper as an SBC

On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, J. Oquendo wrote:

> Anyone using Juniper as an SBC, if so what are your experiences with it.
Remember,
> Juniper bought Kagoor way back when but then dropped it as a standalone
SBC[1].
> Newport for me right now is a nono[2] and we've looked at Acme in the
past, so
> just looking for any sidenotes to those using anything from Juniper from
a real
> world POV. To my Juniper engineers on this list, just asking what
others' realistic
> views are. ;)

Stay far far away, go look at Covergence and Acme.

><>
Nathan Stratton                                CTO, BlinkMind, Inc.
nathan at robotics.net                         nathan at blinkmind.com
http://www.robotics.net                        http://www.blinkmind.com






More information about the Voipsec mailing list