[VOIPSEC] Juniper as an SBC

[Jacek Materna]

Agreed. Go Acme over juniper if an SBC is what you need for your traffic mgt.

Jacek Materna
Director of Software Development

VoIPshield Systems Inc.
150 Katimavik Road, Suite 102
Ottawa Ontario K2L 2N2
Canada
tel +1 (613) 224-4443 ext. 305

www.voipshield.com
Security for VoIP

www.bleedingvoip.com
Where the edge bleeds

-----Original Message-----
From: voipsec-bounces at voipsa.org [mailto:voipsec-bounces at voipsa.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Stratton
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 5:49 PM
To: J. Oquendo
Cc: voipsec at voipsa.org
Subject: Re: [VOIPSEC] Juniper as an SBC

On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, J. Oquendo wrote:

> Anyone using Juniper as an SBC, if so what are your experiences with it. Remember,
> Juniper bought Kagoor way back when but then dropped it as a standalone SBC[1].
> Newport for me right now is a nono[2] and we've looked at Acme in the past, so
> just looking for any sidenotes to those using anything from Juniper from a real
> world POV. To my Juniper engineers on this list, just asking what others' realistic
> views are. ;)

Stay far far away, go look at Covergence and Acme.

><>
Nathan Stratton                                CTO, BlinkMind, Inc.
nathan at robotics.net                         nathan at blinkmind.com
http://www.robotics.net                        http://www.blinkmind.com

_______________________________________________
Voipsec mailing list
Voipsec at voipsa.org
http://voipsa.org/mailman/listinfo/voipsec_voipsa.org