[VOIPSEC] e911 peculiarities
AlexE at sunbelt-software.com
Fri Feb 13 22:57:29 GMT 2009
>It would be nice to avoid political ranting on an international list.
From: voipsec-bounces at voipsa.org [mailto:voipsec-bounces at voipsa.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Alvarez
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 5:52 PM
To: voipsec at voipsa.org
Subject: Re: [VOIPSEC] e911 peculiarities
On Feb 13, 2009, at 9:52 AM, ANDRE LUIZ CABRAL DUTRA wrote:
> If a company does that (911) to allow the use of this services for emergency
> calls, that is great, but in many cases it doesn´t work that way, money
> almost always comes first. - American way - Don´t pay, don´t have compare it
> with health care. Is the same problem. Everyone should have it but it
> doesn´t work that way. It will always return to the interest of few and
Nice anti-American rant. We're not a socialist country (well, not
completely yet anyway). Those who prefer socialism over self
responsibility have other options on where to live.
Carrying any services for a non-payer is not a moral imperative.
Companies exist to make money, not to provide services to people who
can't pay. The ILEC/CLEC has special privileges and thus has special
responsibilities, but a VoIP carrier doesn't get any of those special
privileges and is not bound by the special responsibilities.
It would be nice to avoid political ranting on an international list.
Voipsec mailing list
Voipsec at voipsa.org
More information about the Voipsec