[VOIPSEC] VoIP Attack : How feasible
Simon Horne
s.horne at packetizer.com
Fri Jul 28 19:02:09 CDT 2006
Michael
I totally agree, with this statement.
At 05:50 AM 29/07/2006, Michael Slavitch wrote:
..delete
>Systems designers forget that most of the business world is made up of
>small and medium sized companies, 500 or so people is the mean, and
>these places don't have time or energy for fancy deployments or IPSEC
>or whatever, they want something that solves a problem, can be
>maintained by people with a high school level of education, and 'just
>works'. Microsoft mastered this with Windows NT, which is why Novell
>is now a pale shadow and Microsoft dominates corporate networking.
>Remember, it's all about money. We work for salesmen.
VPN's have been around for 10+ years and they do work very well but have
never achieved widespread deployment. People in their hundreds of millions
have chosen something they just download and install and it just works.
SKYPE My point is after nearly a decade of standards based VoIP
development there appears to be no clear functional method for NAT
traversal within SIP (outside of possibly ICE and that has not achieved
widespread deployment). The need for a VPN is not by choice but by necessity.
Simon
More information about the Voipsec
mailing list