[VOIPSEC] Voipsec Digest, Vol 8, Issue 26
Christopher A. Martin
chris at InfraVAST.com
Wed Sep 7 18:38:38 CDT 2005
I agree.
And as was pointed out earlier in the thread by another person, the
delay is acceptable. People are becoming accustomed to delays, otherwise
cell phones would not be as popular as they are today.
Chris
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>At 07:40 PM 9/6/2005, Lee Dilkie wrote:
>
>
>
>>This is why the TLS/SSL solution, with keys in plaintext, is so
>>appealing. There is no delay as there is no key negotation (other than
>>the trival "here's the key I want you to use!"). And TLS/SSL is also why
>>we're bemoaning having to switch to tcp connections. Things are just
>>never easy, eh?
>>
>>
>
>I STRONGLY feel we need to drop discussions of plaintext keys that
>are handled by multiple servers, in different trust domains. This is
>no different that what the AAA group struggled with and spent years
>trying to come up with some solution (like Housley's CMS approach).
>
>PLEASE let us concentrate on provably strong keying mechanisms. Ones
>that work and consumers will buy.
>
>
>Robert Moskowitz
>Senior Technical Director
>ICSA Labs, a division of Cybertrust, Inc.
>W: 248-968-9809
>F: 248-968-2824
>VoIP: 248-291-0713
>E: rgm at icsalabs.com
>
>There's no limit to what can be accomplished if it doesn't matter who
>gets the credit
>_______________________________________________
>Voipsec mailing list
>Voipsec at voipsa.org
>http://voipsa.org/mailman/listinfo/voipsec_voipsa.org
>
>
>
>
More information about the Voipsec
mailing list