[VOIPSEC] IPv6 and the demise (or not) of NAT (was Re: Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE))
Dan Wing
dwing at cisco.com
Tue Nov 15 12:36:59 CST 2005
> > Another big problem with UPnP is the double-nat problem.
> >Put a device behind two UPnP NATs and you can't open a port
> >through both.
> >With STUN/etc, you can open ports through any number of NATs.
>
> Except if one of those NAT's is symmetric (which is 90% of
> all routers are) then it maybe broke.
draft-jennings-behave-test-results,
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jennings-behave-test-results-01.t
xt>, shows test results of a couple dozen NATs. Only one NAT was found to
be symmetric.
Do you have other data to share?
-d
More information about the Voipsec
mailing list