[VOIPSEC] IPv6 and the demise (or not) of NAT (was Re: Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE))

[Robert Moskowitz]

At 02:26 AM 11/14/2005, dan_york at Mitel.com wrote:
>Goeff,  (or the (many?) others who have opinions on this subject)
>
> > Any solution to this problem is imperfect until we all migrate to IPv6
> > where NAT is no longer necessary.

Throughout the IPng discussions, I had always held that NAT would not 
go away.  Neither for corporate use or for home use.

And this is not just because I am one of the authors of RFC 1918!

The arguements are many; I don't see any value of going into it here.

Just don't build your IPv6 business plan on no more NATs....



For time is the longest distance between two places.

Tennessee Williams