[VOIPSEC] IPv6 and the demise (or not) of NAT (was Re: Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE))
rgm at icsalabs.com
Mon Nov 14 17:31:15 GMT 2005
At 02:26 AM 11/14/2005, dan_york at Mitel.com wrote:
>Goeff, (or the (many?) others who have opinions on this subject)
> > Any solution to this problem is imperfect until we all migrate to IPv6
> > where NAT is no longer necessary.
Throughout the IPng discussions, I had always held that NAT would not
go away. Neither for corporate use or for home use.
And this is not just because I am one of the authors of RFC 1918!
The arguements are many; I don't see any value of going into it here.
Just don't build your IPv6 business plan on no more NATs....
For time is the longest distance between two places.
More information about the Voipsec