[VOIPSEC] Voipsec Digest, Vol 12, Issue 24
Simon Horne
s.horne at packetizer.com
Wed Dec 28 22:59:31 CST 2005
At 07:27 AM 29/12/2005, you wrote:
>I would like someone to define expensive.
>
>Linksys offer a Skype phone for $130.00 (in my area) which is around the
>price of most REGULAR non-encrypted non-AP phones.
>
>Anyone?
Given that the linksys Skype phone is non-encrypted from the handset to the
base station then really it's just a cordless phone. We looked at cordless
USB units for our secure softphone but decided against it for that reason,
why have a secure encrypted phone call when the end user uses a standard
type cordless phone?. Which is why we went with wired units. You can get
desktop Speakerphone USB phones for under $50 (that are designed for
SKYPE) In fact we offer 5 different USB Phones for SKYPE and 3 of which
also work with other softphones like XTEN, stanaphone etc...
The biggest problem I found with USB Phones with SKYPE and a few non
computer people have complained to us about it too is that they are not
fully plug 'n play which means they require additional software to drive
the USB devices' numpad to work with SKYPE and it only really works for
skype out calls and navigating through the contact lists etc.
To be honest I think USB Phones are the way forward as they are a lot
cheaper alternative to secure IP phones (given that the software is free or
near free) and if the secure softphone supports them auto-detect,
completely plug 'n play and is NAT friendly then it can be easily, cheaply
and effectively deployed.
This is the direction we have taken the development of our softphone in.
Simon
Packetizer Labs
http://www.packetizer.com/labs
>Cheers,
>
>James Friesen, CIO
>
>Lucretia Enterprises
>"Our World Is Here..."
>Info at lucretia dot ca
>http://lucretia.ca
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Henry Sinnreich [mailto:henry at pulver.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 8:05 AM
> > To: Voipsec at voipsa.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOIPSEC] Voipsec Digest, Vol 12, Issue 24
> >
> > > You can't sell expensive phones or nobody will be your customer
> >
> >
> >
> > Check out the Skype phones, (or the Nimcat/Avaya or Peerio
> > PBX phones).
> >
> > There is no central call routing and the phones are both
> > secure and affordable.
> >
> >
> >
> > Both the business models and the platforms (no VoIP
> > infrastructure) are different though from the "carrier"
> > model, and this changes the security model and cost in a
> > fundamental way.
> >
> >
> >
> > Let the flames come! :-)
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks, Henry
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Voipsec-bounces at voipsa.org
> > [mailto:Voipsec-bounces at voipsa.org] On Behalf Of
> > Voipsec-request at voipsa.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 6:00 AM
> > To: Voipsec at voipsa.org
> > Subject: Voipsec Digest, Vol 12, Issue 24
> >
> >
> >
> > Send Voipsec mailing list submissions to
> >
> > Voipsec at voipsa.org
> >
> >
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >
> > http://voipsa.org/mailman/listinfo/voipsec_voipsa.org
> >
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >
> > Voipsec-request at voipsa.org
> >
> >
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >
> > Voipsec-owner at voipsa.org
> >
> >
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >
> > than "Re: Contents of Voipsec digest..."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >
> >
> > 1. VoIP vulnerabilities summarization (david.castro)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > Message: 1
> >
> > Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:12:14 +0100
> >
> > From: "david.castro" <david.castro at adianta.net>
> >
> > Subject: [VOIPSEC] VoIP vulnerabilities summarization
> >
> > To: Voipsec at voipsa.org
> >
> > Message-ID: <43B159CE.8030706 at adianta.net>
> >
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello, I'm David.
> >
> > I've just read your interesting "chat", and I learned a lot, but I'd
> >
> > like make a question about SIP.
> >
> > Let's imagine you are making an IP phone-operator. You have a central
> >
> > access point (server SIP and gateway to PSTN), or several
> > access points
> >
> > across internet. You can sell to your customers a IP-phone, so they
> >
> > don't have a computer run to chat on the phone. You can't sell
> >
> > expensives phones or nobody will be your customer, so the
> > phones hasn't
> >
> > TLS, IPSEC or proxy SIP, because they are connecting direct
> > to access point.
> >
> > How do you protect this scenario?
> >
> > I'm using login/password in register request, but in other request I
> >
> > can't by the phones. What would you do?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Voipsec mailing list
> >
> > Voipsec at voipsa.org
> >
> > http://voipsa.org/mailman/listinfo/voipsec_voipsa.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > End of Voipsec Digest, Vol 12, Issue 24
> >
> > ***************************************
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Voipsec mailing list
> > Voipsec at voipsa.org
> > http://voipsa.org/mailman/listinfo/voipsec_voipsa.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Voipsec mailing list
>Voipsec at voipsa.org
>http://voipsa.org/mailman/listinfo/voipsec_voipsa.org
More information about the Voipsec
mailing list