<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Voice of VOIPSA &#187; Mark Collier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voipsa.org/blog/author/mark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voipsa.org/blog</link>
	<description>Collective thoughts and musings on the state of VoIP security today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<cloud domain='voipsa.org' port='80' path='/blog/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Voice/Unified Communications Security: State of Security Report Webinar</title>
		<link>http://voipsa.org/blog/2011/03/30/voiceunified-communications-security-state-of-security-report-webinar/</link>
		<comments>http://voipsa.org/blog/2011/03/30/voiceunified-communications-security-state-of-security-report-webinar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Collier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VoIP Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voipsa.org/blog/?p=1192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We at SecureLogix are hosting a webinar today to cover the Voice and Unified Communications: State of Security Report today at 1:00 CST along with the folks from NoJitter. Here is a link to the webinar registration page.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We at SecureLogix are hosting a webinar today to cover the Voice and Unified Communications: State of Security Report today at 1:00 CST along with the folks from NoJitter. Here is a <a href="https://event.on24.com/eventRegistration/EventLobbyServlet?target=registration.jsp&amp;eventid=299143&amp;sessionid=1&amp;key=1D85F3B3947BA08EE7CBE695FAD8983D&amp;partnerref=ecweb&amp;sourcepage=register">link to the webinar registration page</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voipsa.org/blog/2011/03/30/voiceunified-communications-security-state-of-security-report-webinar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State of Communications Security Report is Live</title>
		<link>http://voipsa.org/blog/2011/03/07/state-of-communications-security-report-is-live/</link>
		<comments>http://voipsa.org/blog/2011/03/07/state-of-communications-security-report-is-live/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Collier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VoIP Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voipsa.org/blog/?p=1181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a link to the SecureLogix State of Communications Security Report. It is currently at the NoJitter site. We will post it to our website and here in a couple of weeks. http://www.nojitter.com/sponsoredcontent/view/cid/3900003 This is the first time ever that anyone has released a security report that is focused on voice/VoIP/communications. The report describes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a link to the SecureLogix State of Communications Security Report. It is currently at the NoJitter site. We will post it to our website and here in a couple of weeks.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nojitter.com/sponsoredcontent/view/cid/3900003">http://www.nojitter.com/sponsoredcontent/view/cid/3900003</a></p>
<p>This is the first time ever that anyone has released a security report that is focused on voice/VoIP/communications. The report describes voice security trends and includes a ton of data from 100&#8242;s of assessments, that backs up the trends we present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voipsa.org/blog/2011/03/07/state-of-communications-security-report-is-live/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on Telephony Denial of Service (TDoS) Attacks</title>
		<link>http://voipsa.org/blog/2010/07/07/more-on-telephony-denial-of-service-tdos-attacks/</link>
		<comments>http://voipsa.org/blog/2010/07/07/more-on-telephony-denial-of-service-tdos-attacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 22:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Collier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VoIP Attacks in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VoIP Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VoIP Vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voipsa.org/blog/?p=928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I assume most everyone has seen the FBI press release on Telephony Denial of Service (TDoS). For those who have not, see: http://newark.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel10/nk051110.htm I am also seeing the term used to describe enterprise-directed DoS, where an attacker typically floods a contact center with calls. I have recently worked with both enterprises, service providers, and hosted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume most everyone has seen the FBI press release on Telephony Denial of Service (TDoS). For those who have not, see:</p>
<p><a href="http://newark.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel10/nk051110.htm">http://newark.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel10/nk051110.htm</a></p>
<p>I am also seeing the term used to describe enterprise-directed DoS, where an attacker typically floods a contact center with calls. I have recently worked with both enterprises, service providers, and hosted IVR companies that have seen these attacks. The current motive seems to be traffic pumping/revenue generation, not DoS per se, but the side impact is that operation at the target sites is degraded or seriously disrupted, depending on call volume and trunk capacity. Interestingly, the targets I have talked to are primarily using TDM trunks, while the attackers (according to the service providers I have talked to) are using VoIP. I have a post on my blog with more information:</p>
<p><a href="http://voipsecurityblog.typepad.com/marks_voip_security_blog/2010/06/more-on-telephony-dos-tdos.html">http://voipsecurityblog.typepad.com/marks_voip_security_blog/2010/06/more-on-telephony-dos-tdos.html</a></p>
<p>Is anyone else seeing these attacks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voipsa.org/blog/2010/07/07/more-on-telephony-denial-of-service-tdos-attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Additional VoIP Attack Tools</title>
		<link>http://voipsa.org/blog/2006/10/30/additional-voip-attack-tools/</link>
		<comments>http://voipsa.org/blog/2006/10/30/additional-voip-attack-tools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Collier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[VoIP Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VoIP Security Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voipsa.org/blog/2006/10/30/additional-voip-attack-tools/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Endler and I posted several new tools on our &#8220;Hacking Exposed&#8221; website, www.hackingvoip.com. We also provided updates and better README files for some of the existing tools. Here is a quick summary of the new tools: rtpinsertsound/rtpmixsound &#8211; these tools take the contents of a .wav or tcpdump format file and insert or mix [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Endler and I posted <a target="_blank" href="http://www.hackingvoip.com/sec_tools.html">several new tools</a> on our &#8220;Hacking Exposed&#8221; website, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.hackingvoip.com/">www.hackingvoip.com</a>. We also provided updates and better README files for some of the existing tools. Here is a quick summary of the new tools:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>rtpinsertsound/rtpmixsound</strong> &#8211; these tools take the contents of a .wav or tcpdump format file and insert or mix in the sound. These tools require access (sniffing of the VoIP traffic but not necessarily MITM) to the RTP stream, so they can properly craft sequence numbers, timestamps, etc. rtpinsertsound, with the right timing, can be used to add words or phrases to a conversation. rtpmixsound can be used to merge in background audio, like noise, sounds from a &#8220;gentlemans club&#8221;, curse words, etc., etc. These tools have been tested in a variety of vendor environments and work in pretty much any environment, where encryption isn&#8217;t used.</li>
<li><strong>redirectpoison</strong> &#8211; this tool works in a SIP signaling environment, to monitor for an INVITE request and respond with a SIP redirect response, causing the issuing system to direct a new INVITE to another location. This  tool requires  access to the SIP signaling, but does not require a MITM (Man-in-the-middle attack). We tested this tool with the Asterisk and SER SIP proxies, along with a variety of SIP phones.</li>
<li><strong>spitter</strong> &#8211; this tool works in conjunction with Asterisk, to set up a voice SPAM/SPIT generation platform. Once Asterisk is set up, spitter is used to schedule any number of  calls, using your choice of audio files.</li>
</ul>
<p>The tools come with README files, so they should be pretty easy to use. Please let us know what you think. We are particularly interested in results for the rtpxxxsound tools. A number of us &#8220;security experts&#8221; have been warning of these attacks, but this is the first set of tools I have seen that actually accomplish them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://voipsa.org/blog/2006/10/30/additional-voip-attack-tools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

