<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Aircell is (probably) blocking VoIP phone calls on planes (hint&#8230; VoIP Whack-A-Mole)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voipsa.org/blog/2008/08/26/how-aircell-is-probably-blocking-voip-phone-calls-on-planes-hint-voip-whack-a-mole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voipsa.org/blog/2008/08/26/how-aircell-is-probably-blocking-voip-phone-calls-on-planes-hint-voip-whack-a-mole/</link>
	<description>Collective thoughts and musings on the state of VoIP security today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:11:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Voice of VOIPSA &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Update on the Aircell / VoIP-on-a-plane prohibition - and an Aircell response</title>
		<link>http://voipsa.org/blog/2008/08/26/how-aircell-is-probably-blocking-voip-phone-calls-on-planes-hint-voip-whack-a-mole/comment-page-1/#comment-243103</link>
		<dc:creator>Voice of VOIPSA &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Update on the Aircell / VoIP-on-a-plane prohibition - and an Aircell response</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voipsa.org/blog/?p=461#comment-243103</guid>
		<description>[...] my two posts on Tuesday explaining how Aircell was probably blocking VoIP and then why the Phweet/Tringme worked (temporarily), there have been a number of other posts that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my two posts on Tuesday explaining how Aircell was probably blocking VoIP and then why the Phweet/Tringme worked (temporarily), there have been a number of other posts that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aircell: On U.S. Planes, VoIP Will Be Muted - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://voipsa.org/blog/2008/08/26/how-aircell-is-probably-blocking-voip-phone-calls-on-planes-hint-voip-whack-a-mole/comment-page-1/#comment-242149</link>
		<dc:creator>Aircell: On U.S. Planes, VoIP Will Be Muted - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voipsa.org/blog/?p=461#comment-242149</guid>
		<description>[...] can block the pure-play VoIP services because VoIP calls typically use a protocol called UDP. Dan York, CTO of Voxeo, has a great post explaining how VoIP works. In comparison, it is much harder to block calls that use the web and TCP protocol. York explains [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can block the pure-play VoIP services because VoIP calls typically use a protocol called UDP. Dan York, CTO of Voxeo, has a great post explaining how VoIP works. In comparison, it is much harder to block calls that use the web and TCP protocol. York explains [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christofer Hoff</title>
		<link>http://voipsa.org/blog/2008/08/26/how-aircell-is-probably-blocking-voip-phone-calls-on-planes-hint-voip-whack-a-mole/comment-page-1/#comment-242090</link>
		<dc:creator>Christofer Hoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voipsa.org/blog/?p=461#comment-242090</guid>
		<description>...or they could just as easily be using any one of the DPI/transparent proxies which provide protocol detection and application granularity -- even in tunneled/encrypted traffic.

Palo Alto Networks does this -- I had Skype running on my test machines behind it and it easily identified Skype in realtime.  Blocking was simply facilitated by a policy -- and by the way, I could choose to allow the IM but not the &quot;voice&quot; calls.

We&#039;ve come a long way since whack-a-mole.  No crazy incantations, chicken bones or voodoo required...

/Hoff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;or they could just as easily be using any one of the DPI/transparent proxies which provide protocol detection and application granularity &#8212; even in tunneled/encrypted traffic.</p>
<p>Palo Alto Networks does this &#8212; I had Skype running on my test machines behind it and it easily identified Skype in realtime.  Blocking was simply facilitated by a policy &#8212; and by the way, I could choose to allow the IM but not the &#8220;voice&#8221; calls.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve come a long way since whack-a-mole.  No crazy incantations, chicken bones or voodoo required&#8230;</p>
<p>/Hoff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://voipsa.org/blog/2008/08/26/how-aircell-is-probably-blocking-voip-phone-calls-on-planes-hint-voip-whack-a-mole/comment-page-1/#comment-242041</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voipsa.org/blog/?p=461#comment-242041</guid>
		<description>Nice summary Dan.

&gt;&gt;What if (hint) the folks at Aircell forgot to watch all protocols?&lt;&gt;someone will inevitably find a way to “cloak” their VoIP calls so that they are unrecognizable or indistinguishable from other data traffic…&lt;&lt;

My experience is that detecting *two-way* voice is actually pretty easy and I don&#039;t believe it is possible to completely disguise the footprint of two-way voice without actually destroying the quality of the call. The two-way part is the hint - if you extend your pattern matching from wireshark to looking at both sides of the conversation the pattern that you&#039;ll see is two streams of data, both quite chunky in size, and rarely overlapping. People having a conversation generally speak one at a time.

It&#039;s a simple pattern to spot. And you can&#039;t change that pattern without either mangling it in data and decoding each end (which produces latency) or changing peoples habits of how they communicate.

Dean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice summary Dan.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;What if (hint) the folks at Aircell forgot to watch all protocols?&lt;&gt;someone will inevitably find a way to “cloak” their VoIP calls so that they are unrecognizable or indistinguishable from other data traffic…&lt;&lt;</p>
<p>My experience is that detecting *two-way* voice is actually pretty easy and I don&#8217;t believe it is possible to completely disguise the footprint of two-way voice without actually destroying the quality of the call. The two-way part is the hint &#8211; if you extend your pattern matching from wireshark to looking at both sides of the conversation the pattern that you&#8217;ll see is two streams of data, both quite chunky in size, and rarely overlapping. People having a conversation generally speak one at a time.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a simple pattern to spot. And you can&#8217;t change that pattern without either mangling it in data and decoding each end (which produces latency) or changing peoples habits of how they communicate.</p>
<p>Dean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voice of VOIPSA &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The reason why (probably) you can use Phweet on a plane when Skype is blocked</title>
		<link>http://voipsa.org/blog/2008/08/26/how-aircell-is-probably-blocking-voip-phone-calls-on-planes-hint-voip-whack-a-mole/comment-page-1/#comment-242038</link>
		<dc:creator>Voice of VOIPSA &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The reason why (probably) you can use Phweet on a plane when Skype is blocked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voipsa.org/blog/?p=461#comment-242038</guid>
		<description>[...] Voice of VOIPSA Collective thoughts and musings on the state of VoIP security today.      &#171; How Aircell is (probably) blocking VoIP phone calls on planes (hint&#8230; VoIP Whack-A-Mole) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Voice of VOIPSA Collective thoughts and musings on the state of VoIP security today.      &laquo; How Aircell is (probably) blocking VoIP phone calls on planes (hint&#8230; VoIP Whack-A-Mole) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
