<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snom Security - A Positive Vendor Response Case Study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voipsa.org/blog/2008/04/01/snom-security-a-positive-vendor-response-case-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voipsa.org/blog/2008/04/01/snom-security-a-positive-vendor-response-case-study/</link>
	<description>Collective thoughts and musings on the state of VoIP security today.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan York</title>
		<link>http://voipsa.org/blog/2008/04/01/snom-security-a-positive-vendor-response-case-study/#comment-172011</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voipsa.org/blog/2008/04/01/snom-security-a-positive-vendor-response-case-study/#comment-172011</guid>
		<description>Shawn,
I agree it's great to see Snom providing such a positive response. Also agree with your suggestions.

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shawn,<br />
I agree it&#8217;s great to see Snom providing such a positive response. Also agree with your suggestions.</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
