<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Isolation vs. Integration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voipsa.org/blog/2007/10/24/isolation-vs-integration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voipsa.org/blog/2007/10/24/isolation-vs-integration/</link>
	<description>Collective thoughts and musings on the state of VoIP security today.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Voice of VOIPSA &#187; Blog Archive &#187; VoIP Hopper 0.9.9 released with improved VLAN hopping</title>
		<link>http://voipsa.org/blog/2007/10/24/isolation-vs-integration/#comment-160198</link>
		<dc:creator>Voice of VOIPSA &#187; Blog Archive &#187; VoIP Hopper 0.9.9 released with improved VLAN hopping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voipsa.org/blog/2007/10/24/isolation-vs-integration/#comment-160198</guid>
		<description>[...] people say that VLANs were a true security mechanism (Hint: They&#8217;re NOT!). We&#8217;ve written about it before and talked about on a Blue Box episode and a Telcom Junkies show and it is indeed an interesting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] people say that VLANs were a true security mechanism (Hint: They&#8217;re NOT!). We&#8217;ve written about it before and talked about on a Blue Box episode and a Telcom Junkies show and it is indeed an interesting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hudson Barton</title>
		<link>http://voipsa.org/blog/2007/10/24/isolation-vs-integration/#comment-113995</link>
		<dc:creator>Hudson Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voipsa.org/blog/2007/10/24/isolation-vs-integration/#comment-113995</guid>
		<description>I heard someplace that at least a few of the various streams (voice, data, video, and text) in Skype are separately encrypted... that is to say they are isolated from each other by means of encryption.  Is this true?  I suspect that voice and video are in the same encryption "envelope", but that text and data are in their own separate envelopes.   Does this Skype architecture satisfy your concern about isolation and integration?  If you wouldn't mind, please respond to my email address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard someplace that at least a few of the various streams (voice, data, video, and text) in Skype are separately encrypted&#8230; that is to say they are isolated from each other by means of encryption.  Is this true?  I suspect that voice and video are in the same encryption &#8220;envelope&#8221;, but that text and data are in their own separate envelopes.   Does this Skype architecture satisfy your concern about isolation and integration?  If you wouldn&#8217;t mind, please respond to my email address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
