<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Voice SPAM - the Fightback Begins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voipsa.org/blog/2007/01/11/voice-spam-the-fightback-begins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voipsa.org/blog/2007/01/11/voice-spam-the-fightback-begins/</link>
	<description>Collective thoughts and musings on the state of VoIP security today.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martyn Davies</title>
		<link>http://voipsa.org/blog/2007/01/11/voice-spam-the-fightback-begins/#comment-14259</link>
		<dc:creator>Martyn Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voipsa.org/blog/2007/01/11/voice-spam-the-fightback-begins/#comment-14259</guid>
		<description>I know there are IETF discussions underway about authenticated CallerID in the VoIP world. This will be a great benefit as today CallerID cannot be trusted, and so blacklisting is of doubtful value.  I am guessing that whatever system they come up with for IPv4 will also work with IPv6.  Personally I'm sceptical that IPv6 will come into wide use anytime soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know there are IETF discussions underway about authenticated CallerID in the VoIP world. This will be a great benefit as today CallerID cannot be trusted, and so blacklisting is of doubtful value.  I am guessing that whatever system they come up with for IPv4 will also work with IPv6.  Personally I&#8217;m sceptical that IPv6 will come into wide use anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kand</title>
		<link>http://voipsa.org/blog/2007/01/11/voice-spam-the-fightback-begins/#comment-13881</link>
		<dc:creator>Kand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 01:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voipsa.org/blog/2007/01/11/voice-spam-the-fightback-begins/#comment-13881</guid>
		<description>Martyn,

A very different way to look at indeed.

So, there is a different kind of 'mobility' for SPAMers to move to different 'hideouts' as they get  blacklisted. That begs the question: Doesn't blacklisting becomes harder with IPV6?

Kand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martyn,</p>
<p>A very different way to look at indeed.</p>
<p>So, there is a different kind of &#8216;mobility&#8217; for SPAMers to move to different &#8216;hideouts&#8217; as they get  blacklisted. That begs the question: Doesn&#8217;t blacklisting becomes harder with IPV6?</p>
<p>Kand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
