Comments on: VoIP providers must adhere to CALEA by May 14 http://voipsa.org/blog/2006/06/13/voip-providers-must-adhere-to-calea-by-next-may-14/ Collective thoughts and musings on the state of VoIP security today. Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:41:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Frank http://voipsa.org/blog/2006/06/13/voip-providers-must-adhere-to-calea-by-next-may-14/#comment-54117 Frank Tue, 08 May 2007 12:22:59 +0000 http://voipsa.org/blog/2006/06/13/voip-providers-must-adhere-to-calea-by-next-may-14/#comment-54117 The strange thing is in Holland, that we need first a PSTN line, and THEN a VOIP connection. Allowing is 1 thing, ability is second. Frank The strange thing is in Holland, that we need first a PSTN line, and THEN a VOIP connection. Allowing is 1 thing, ability is second.

Frank

]]> By: Voice of VOIPSA » Blog Archive » Internet pioneers say VOIP wiretapping complicated http://voipsa.org/blog/2006/06/13/voip-providers-must-adhere-to-calea-by-next-may-14/#comment-139 Voice of VOIPSA » Blog Archive » Internet pioneers say VOIP wiretapping complicated Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:27:53 +0000 http://voipsa.org/blog/2006/06/13/voip-providers-must-adhere-to-calea-by-next-may-14/#comment-139 [...] As a followup to Dustin Trammell’s posting about CALEA compliance, the Information Technology Association of America released a report today entitled Security Implications of Applying the Communications Assistance to Law Enforcement Act to Voice over IP. To quote from a an InfoWorld article covering the report: [...] […] As a followup to Dustin Trammell’s posting about CALEA compliance, the Information Technology Association of America released a report today entitled Security Implications of Applying the Communications Assistance to Law Enforcement Act to Voice over IP. To quote from a an InfoWorld article covering the report: […]

]]> By: Randell Jesup http://voipsa.org/blog/2006/06/13/voip-providers-must-adhere-to-calea-by-next-may-14/#comment-124 Randell Jesup Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:08:00 +0000 http://voipsa.org/blog/2006/06/13/voip-providers-must-adhere-to-calea-by-next-may-14/#comment-124 This has nothing directly to do with hop-by-hop versus end-to-end (other than making end-to-end much more attractive). This just states that CALEA applies to any provider who has PSTN in-and-out capability (even through a 3rd party), and that it applies to ALL calls by that provider, even IP-to-IP. CALEA does not (currently) require that the provider decrypt the call or block end-to-end encryption, only that they provide the keys for the call IF they have them. This has nothing directly to do with hop-by-hop versus end-to-end (other than making end-to-end much more attractive).

This just states that CALEA applies to any provider who has PSTN in-and-out capability (even through a 3rd party), and that it applies to ALL calls by that provider, even IP-to-IP. CALEA does not (currently) require that the provider decrypt the call or block end-to-end encryption, only that they provide the keys for the call IF they have them.

]]> By: Dan York http://voipsa.org/blog/2006/06/13/voip-providers-must-adhere-to-calea-by-next-may-14/#comment-123 Dan York Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:22:58 +0000 http://voipsa.org/blog/2006/06/13/voip-providers-must-adhere-to-calea-by-next-may-14/#comment-123 I'd note that Jeff Pulver has some more useful info in his <a href="http://pulverblog.pulver.com/archives/004826.html" rel="nofollow">post about recent legislation</a> and his <a href="http://pulverblog.pulver.com/archives/004484.html" rel="nofollow">May 5th post about the CALEA hearing.</a> I’d note that Jeff Pulver has some more useful info in his post about recent legislation and his May 5th post about the CALEA hearing.

]]>